No sane person could suggest that a 21st century, secular liberal democracy which regards religion as an irrelevance yet worships at the altar of human rights, homosexuality, gender equality and the psychological rehabilitation of violent criminals, could possibly be peacefully integrated with a 7th century theocratic dictatorship which places religion at an elevated level of non-negotiability, the gallows for homosexuals, stoning to death for adulteresses and limb amputation for minor crimes.
Yet the oxymoronic motto of the European Union “United in Diversity” is symptomatic of the suicidal / murderous ideology that currently grips the Western ruling elites. Such sentiment is as ridiculous as Divided in Unity – though considerably more dangerous, because behind the deliberately emotive and misleading words lies its literal meaning – Divide and Conquer.
Multiculturalism has been the driving ideology of the West for several decades, and we see the fruits of it all around us. Rather than integrating new arrivals, as worked so well for America during the great migrations, multiculturalism deliberately sets out to divide society rather than unifying it around a common cause. It is a form of cultural apartheid in other words, but rather than racial segregation it is cultural segregation which is encouraged – oddly enough – by those who deem themselves to be liberals…
Under the auspices of multiculturalism, the native inhabitants of Western countries have been brainwashed into believing that their race, religion, culture and history consist only of imperialism, racism, oppression, genocide and ethnic cleansing – in short, Western civilisation and all that formed it is deemed worthy only of guilt and shame. Any attempt to argue against this will be met by a wall of contempt and hatred from the ruling elite, who will utilise the magic word “racist” to quell any resistance.
The incoming foreigners, on the other hand, are told that whilst the Western natives are indeed guilty of all the above, they, the incomers, possess a rich and colourful heritage to be proud of, just as they should be proud of their respective race and religion which despite being “ruthlessly oppressed by Europeans” managed to survive as a thing of beauty, morality and decency.
Thus multiculturalism is used as a psychological weapon of war against the native European. How can we resist if we are racially and religiously guilt-ridden; ashamed of our country, our history and our culture? We are rendered faithless, frightened and lost under the ideological terms of multiculturalism, which strips us of our pride, our national identity, our very being. If we cannot even mentally or vocally resist, how could we ever physically fight, should it come to that at some future point?
It is not racist to insist that Western Muslims owe their cultural loyalty to the country of their newly acquired citizenship. In fact it is essential if we wish to uphold the Western way of life, which previously enjoyed a single political culture – still the basic requirement for disparate cultures to live peacefully together. Multi-ethnic and mono-cultural states have at least the chance of peace, but multi-ethnic and multi-cultural states have a guaranteed history of violence – witness the recent break-up of Yugoslavia which violently erupted along racial and religious fault lines.
Young Muslim males have an enormous advantage over their Western European counterparts. The propaganda Muslims receive is supremacist, leading to pride in their race, their religion, their culture and their heritage. Many are also fanatical and belligerent. They look at appeasing Western leaders prostrating themselves before Islam; the drink and drug soaked decadent youth and the immoral popular culture that no Muslim could ever live with. They note the empty churches, the lack of any belief, let alone self-belief, and they think ‘here is our chance’.
Despite multiculturalism's constant denigration of Western race and culture, it disingenuously maintains that all cultures are equal. But how can Western culture, the flowering of thousands of years of social evolution, possibly be compared to a culture stuck in the sands of an incredibly violent and misogynistic 7th century Arabia that has yet to undergo any form of reformation or liberalisation?
Logically it cannot of course, so our liberal rulers came up with Moral Relativism to get around the problem. If the differences between two cultures are too great to accept, then moral relativism is used to shut down any criticism of the culture at fault. Islam’s attitudes toward female equality for example is not something the liberal West should be able to live with, but we do.
Moral relativism leaps into action here. Who are we to judge? We privileged Europeans cannot sit in judgement on non-European, non-Christian cultures and morals! There is no such thing as right and wrong in moral or cultural terms, even when it means young Muslim girls are subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM) and young Western girls are gang-raped by Muslim males who see nothing morally wrong in carrying out similar actions to their prophet Mohammed, who is still deemed the perfect man in the eyes of 21st century Muslims.
To be “non-judgemental” is of supreme importance to left-liberals, but this tolerant approach does not apply to their enemies on the conservative “right” who are judged as being not just wrong but heretically evil simply because they (conservatives) think brown people slicing off small girls’ clitorises is morally and ethically wrong. Left-liberals appear not to not understand the irony of the situation when they judge conservatives who claim there is such a thing as right or wrong ... to be wrong.
Left liberals do think FGM is wrong of course, but because those carrying it out are non-white and non-Christian it becomes a crime that must not be prosecuted, must be whitewashed lest it draw attention to the perpetrators. Our left-liberal rulers are privately well aware of their obscene hypocrisy when it comes to moral relativism, but in public they utilise the lie in order to further the power of the foreign culture and, even more importantly, to delegitimise the foundations of Western civilisation.
These extreme double standards point to insanity. When left-liberals pronounce disparate cultures as equal yet hold the differing cultures to such vastly different levels of accountability, then cultural relativism ceases to be a tool designed to enhance community cohesion and becomes instead a pathological ideology of hatred aimed squarely at the Western European alone.
Recent events such as the gang-rape of girls in Britain and the rape and assaults on girls in Europe by Angela Merkel’s Muslim migrants are a prime example of just how multiculturalism and moral relativism is deployed by the left-liberal establishment. Can anyone even begin to imagine the media headlines if right-wing European males were travelling into Muslim areas of a city and raping and molesting Muslim girls? It would be wall-to-wall 24hr news and moral soul searching. But in the case of Islam on European abuse the media, the police and the politicians do their very best to cover it up.
Multiculturalism and moral relativism are not examples of pathological, Left-liberal double standards though, despite their appearing as such. What they are is very clear and stark. They exist to render Western Europeans defenceless in the face of the genuine threat that is Islam. And Islam is now the principal ally of Left-liberalism’s war against the traditional West.