Paul Weston - It's Not Racist to Defend Your Country

The Left - Mad, Bad, or Criminally Ignorant?

The launch of my new party Liberty GB has been noticed by Searchlight magazine, which is linked to Hope not Hate and Unite Against Fascism. Searchlight is essentially a communist front operation disguised as an anti-fascist organisation. Its banner reads: “Fighting fascism and racism internationally for nearly fifty years”.
In the peculiar world view of communists, anyone who disagrees with them is a fascist, and anyone who recognises that far-left extremists are using mass immigration/ multiculturalism as physical and ideological pawns to fracture traditional (and capitalist) Great Britain will be smeared as a racist.

Searchlight’s Sonia Gable (wife of communist Gerry Gable) is most upset about Liberty GB. She stated the following in an article she called “Liberty It Isn’t”:

“Liberty GB’s politics are just more of the same old fascist rubbish. Claiming it is ‘working together [with whom?] to protect our British culture, heritage and freedoms’ it explains that: ‘the Liberal Democrats, Labour and Conservatives manifestly refuse to discuss the most important issues of our time, namely mass Third World immigration, the steady rise of fundamentalist Islam and the hijacking of traditional British culture and institutions by well-organised left-wing “progressives”‘. Enough said.”

This initiated a series of comments between us. Readers can decide as to whether leftists like this are insane, evil, or just criminally ignorant:
[PW = Paul Weston; SG = Sonia Gable]

PW:

Sonia, as an organisation claiming to fight against racism and fascism, you would have my full support. I am viciously attacked by the real far-right, and they are deeply unpleasant people. However, you appear to have little concern about the plight of a distinct racial group which is set to become an ethnic minority (below the age of 30) in its own homeland at some point before 2050. I am unsure as to whether you are driven by overt racism of the anti-white variety here, or deeply held political views that wish to see traditional Britain smashed and re-built along Communist lines. May I ask you some questions? Do you believe that all indigenous racial and religious groups, regardless of their skin colour, have a right to their traditional culture, heritage and homeland? If you consider for example, that some do and some do not, perhaps you would care to explain why the English/British do not? Would you also not agree that Communism is responsible for the murder of over 100 million people, and that this sacrifice (if ends are to justify means) was in vain, when one considers that rather than the “Withering Away of the State” Communism (quite apart from allying itself with Adolf Hitler in 1939) became notable for all-powerful State controlled totalitarian dictatorships, which served only to bring about complete social, moral, economic and environmental catastrophe? As things stand, you appear to support near genocidal racism and fascism — albeit Left-Wing Fascism — which rather goes against your claim that Searchlight is opposed to racism and fascism. Perhaps you would care to elaborate?

Hugh Fitzgerald Asks David Cameron to Define Radical Islam.

Hugh Fitzgerald at New English Review asks an important question of Cameron et al, who refuse to accept the reality of core Islam. Quote:

Cameron and Clegg and Teresa May and others should be asked, publicly, to define ‘radicalization’ among Muslims. Is there a different Qur'an that the ‘radicals’ read? A different biography of Muhammad, the Perfect Man? 

No, the radicals read exactly the same Qur'an, the same Hadith, the same Sira. And the testimony of every defector from Islam is always the same: Islam is violent, Islam is dangerous, Islam is deceptive, Islam is based on an uncompromising division of the world between Believer and Unbeliever and is obsessed with territory, with the further division of Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb, that is between the lands of where Muslims rule and what, for now, are still the lands of the Infidels. 

Dhimmi Britain.

Those who know anything about Islamic expansionism will be aware the Saudi-Arabian based Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) holds the largest bloc vote within the UN, and that they are working hard (and spending a lot of money) trying to stop any criticism of Islam in the West.

The OIC, in accordance with sharia law, deems all criticism of Islam to be invalid. It does not matter if it is true or untrue; the mere fact that it is critical is simply not allowed. Period. The buzzword they have come up with to negate our defence against their extremist ideology is “Islamophobia” which of course means an irrational fear of Islam.

This is very clever. By utilising the word “Islamophobia” they manage to pigeonhole any critics of Islam as being of a mentally questionable equilibrium — which may not be true initially, but may well be the case after a few years, simply because trying to make sense of this madness must surely drive us slowly insane.

British Elites Deny Islamic Reality

With the first jihadi murder of a British soldier on British soil, the nation awoke this morning to a new Multicultural reality. Prime Minister David Cameron, notably absent from the political scene whilst thousands of young white girls were being raped and tortured by Muslim paedophiles, suddenly discovered his inner Churchill and stated the following:

What happened yesterday in Woolwich has sickened us all. On our televisions last night and in our newspapers this morning we have all seen images that are deeply shocking. The people who did this were trying to divide us. They should know something like this will only bring us together and make us stronger… this country will be absolutely resolute in its stand against violent extremism and terror. We will never give in to terror or terrorism.”

Britain's Liberal Death Wish

From the seemingly trivial, like the renaming of Sandhurst’s Mons Hall to the King Hamad Hall in exchange for a pimped mess of Bahraini pottage, to matters of supreme importance, Britain appears to have submitted to Islam. The double standards involved when it comes to protecting Muslims or prosecuting/persecuting non-Muslims are on stark display for all but the most ideologically blinkered to see. Britain is now a country which has lost its collective sanity.

Fanatical Minorities Control Peaceful Majorities.

The following article was not written by me, nor do I know the name of the original author. It has been knocking around the internet for a long time now, but is re-posted here because what it says is so powerful, so pertinent to our catastrophic situation in the West, and so simply put.

I used to know a man whose family were German aristocracy prior to World War II. They owned a number of large industries and estates. I asked him how many German people were true Nazis, and the answer he gave has stuck with me and guided my attitude toward fanaticism ever since.

Mass Immigration, Fraud and Bankrupt Countries

One of the bigger lies promulgated by the liberal/left is that immigration is an absolute necessity if we wish to expand our economy. This is simply not the case: immigration is crippling us as a country. When one bears in mind we are already technically bankrupt, then immigration is just hastening our final day of economic reckoning.

In 1997 the population of Britain was 58.4 million. In 2011 it was 62.6 million. These are official government figures, and thus have little credibility because our politicians routinely lie to us. Indigenous Brits are in demographic decline and an unknown number emigrate every year. The last Labour government admitted they had no real idea how many immigrants were here (nor illegal immigrants) but we can safely assume there are many more foreigners than official figures suggest.

The Rape of a Nation

Britain is a very odd place these days. We are being subjected to what amounts to a racial and cultural war against us, yet our politicians refuse to talk about it, and the overwhelming majority of the indigenous population seem too cowed and fearful to force the politicians to not just recognise the problem, but to actually do something about it.

Consider the recent story regarding the rapist Mawawe Ibraham Karam and what it tells you about the cultural and social fabric of England in 2012. Karam is an illegal immigrant from Sudan who attacked and raped a drunken indigenous English girl in Nottingham earlier this year. Despite the clear distress of the girl, any number of passers-by ignored her predicament, as did local taxi drivers.

Multicultural Defenders of Monocultural Islam

The West is made up of countries built around one basic and incredibly important political ethos — they are all Liberal Democracies. Unfortunately, these countries also share a more recent political ideology which has come to be known as multiculturalism, a word invented in the latter half of the 20th century to enforce our toleration — indeed celebration — of all faiths, cultures and races.

Multiculturalism sits at the pinnacle of Political Correctness (another expression invented in the late 20th century) and is promoted in the post-Christian West with a religious fervour. Multiculturalism trumps all in the PC world. The working class, the homosexual, women in general but particularly so feminist women — all bow before a political and ideological supremacy invented to favour of a foreign race and a foreign religion.

Muslim Paedophiles, Feminists and Future Civil War

Muslim Paedophiles, Feminists and Future Civil War

By Paul Weston

The British police are slightly less of a disgrace than they were a couple of years ago. In the not-so-distant past there was little reporting of native British girls being drugged, groomed, raped and murdered by gangs of Muslim males in our towns and cities.

This wall of silence was erected in the interests of “community cohesion,” a modern verbal concept invented by our liberal elites who think it is better that the indigenous population remain unaware of the horrifying abuse carried out by British Muslims. This is understandable, because to be aware might make even the most fluffy-headed of liberals question the benefits of mass Muslim migration into the liberal democracy that was once Great Britain.
That is one way of explaining their historical silence, I suppose. The fact that Mohammed’s marriage to six-year-old Aisha was consummated when she was only nine might also play a part in the whole sordid affair, along with the fact that Muslim males consider Muslim females to be second class-citizens — not to mention infidel females.

But now that the liberal silence has been broken, we appear to suffering from an absolute epidemic of Muslim paedophilia and abuse. Dewsbury, Leeds, Blackburn, Blackpool, Derby, Rochdale, Birmingham etc. etc. all seem to have their very own Islamic gang-rape-of-under-age-children-enclaves, with the recent additions of Oxford and Glasgow. The ongoing benefits of multiculturalism we are constantly being told to celebrate are certainly well-represented geographically, it must be said.

How To Destroy A Country - Part 3

How To Destroy A Country — Part 3
by Paul Weston

Segregate the Generations. In the course of a political argument, an ancient old lady was told by her grandson that she came from a different generation, to which she replied: “No, I come from a different civilisation.”

 

Quite so. There is little point in controlling the medium of Socialist education if the wisdom of the older “reactionary” generations can still be passed down to the younger. In Africa, the tribal elders are respected and listened to, but in Britain those over a certain age are mocked at worst, or sidelined at best, because they come from a pre-revolutionary era. Those born after 1970 come from the post-revolutionary era, and never the twain shall meet. The educational and media establishments are run in the main by the young or the very young, all soaked in Marxist ideology, and their output is principally aimed only at the young. This is deliberately done in order to ensure the segregation of those who could present an alternative voice to their incessant and twisted Socialist propaganda.

How To Destroy A Country - Part 2

How To Destroy A Country — Part 2
by Paul Weston

The Marxist left/liberals have now completed their Long March Through the Institutions. They claim the varied lunatic policies they enacted were for the benefit of society, but can this really be the case? When viewed through the prism of reality, much of socialism’s ideology appears to have one aim and one aim only: the total destruction of society. This is not an overreaction by any means — if societal destruction was your bag, would you not carry out the following?

Destroy Industry. What is the difference between booming Germany and bankrupt Britain? Simple: Germany manufactures and Britain consumes — but this was not always the case. Britain once had a dominant engineering and ship-building industry, and was Europe’s biggest manufacturer of cars and motor-cycles. It was therefore essential to sabotage our industrial base — our means of production — in order to destroy capitalist Britain. Many Trades Union leaders of the 1950s through to the 1980s were Communists or Communist sympathisers who organised strikes and “downed-tools” so successfully that Britain’s industrial base went to the wall. Writing in the Spectator last year, Douglas Eden outlined the infiltration of British Trades Unions, and how their pro-Soviet ideology was tolerated by Labour Prime Ministers up until the election in 1979 of Margaret Thatcher. Mrs. Thatcher, incidentally, is hated so viscerally by the left/liberals because her defeat of the unions was perceived to have ended the dream of International Communism.

How To Destroy A Country - Part 1

How To Destroy A Country — Part 1
by Paul Weston

“There is a revolution coming. It will not be like the revolutions of the past. It will originate with the individual and with culture, and will change the political structure only as its final act. It will not require violence to succeed, and it cannot be successfully resisted by violence. This is the revolution of the new generation.”

— Charles Reich. “The Greening of America.” 1970.

Every generation bemoans the slippage of standards and the “going to the dogs” of society, but history shows that civilisations and peoples really do collapse utterly. Some even become extinct. Great Britain, needless to say, is no longer as great as it once was, but has the degradation we see around us on a daily basis been caused by well-intentioned liberal stupidity, or by brilliantly-planned leftist malevolence?

Perhaps it is a mixture of both. It has long been known that the hard Left wished to transform the traditional Britain (and West) I was born into. Via a protracted campaign of brainwashing and propaganda they were able to recruit well intentioned liberals into an unknowing alliance. This was not particularly difficult, of course; liberals are easily duped by propagandised platitudes and fall very easily into Lenin’s denouncement of them as Useful Idiots.