Although the population of Great Britain is reputed to consist of only sixty million people, a recent Independent newspaper article argued there may well be up to eighty million inhabitants of this poor benighted island, and as the Muslim population is expanding at ten times the rate of the demographically dying post-Christian population, one can reasonably conclude that a good percentage of these possible extra twenty million bodies are of Islamic descent.
There is no particular reason to disregard such a possibility just because it is not of mainstream acceptance. The number of Sharia courts operating in Britain was thought to be only five until yesterday, which proved to be yet another naïve and delusional liberal hope shattered by the news that there are actually eighty-five Sharia courts sitting in Britain, a seventeen fold increase on received opinion. One is almost tempted to note that Sharia courts are expanding like mosquitoes, but perhaps that would be a little dangerous in the modern Western world, so I will refrain from saying so.
When Mark Steyn attracted the attention of the Canadian Thought Police by relaying in print the words of Mullah Krekar… “Just look at the development within Europe, where the number of Muslims is expanding like mosquitoes” his utilisation of another man’s words led directly to his hate speech trial as the authorities reflexively tried to censor out any semblance of truth as to the real number of Muslims in Europe.
Comparing the reproductive proclivity of Muslims with mosquitoes is to make a rather distasteful association and not one that sits easily with the average European, his or her mind filled with notions of oppression, prejudice and general Western ne’er do well, unlike the good Mullah who presumably has no such mental shackles. But although Mr Krekar is a member of a faith not universally known for its contribution to stand up comedy, was his linking of Muslims and mosquitoes not perhaps subconsciously drawn from an old sketch by Peter Cook and John Cleese, in which Cook took it upon himself to inform Cleese of an interesting fact?
PETER COOK: The grasshopper is an interesting creature…….up and down and up it goes, all over arable land. That’s land that’s actually tilled by Arabs. You see the interesting fact about your Arab is that he can live for a whole year on one grain of rice.
JOHN CLEESE: What rubbish! One year on one grain of rice!
PETER COOK. Sorry, sorry. It's the mosquito that can live for a whole year on one grain of rice...I get those two muddled up because they're next to each other in the dictionary.
JOHN CLEESE: What are?
PETER COOK: Mosquitoes and mosques…
But levity aside, and God knows we need it, as an apparent 40% of British Muslims wish to see Sharia law enacted in the traditionally Judeo-Christian country they were so affably invited to reside within, it becomes important to know what their numbers are. Relying on our ruling elites to honestly inform us of such pertinent facts is perhaps asking too much, but let us take a stab in that general direction.
In 2001, the BBC released a report, stating there were 1.6 million Muslims in Great Britain, equating to some 2.8% of the population.
In 2008, Jacqui Smith, Britain’s masochistically implausible and as such sadly missed Home Secretary disclosed there were 2 million Muslims enjoying the advantages of British democracy.
By 2009, The Times newspaper reported the numbers had surged to 2.4 million, or 4.5% of the population.
The Economist magazine agreed with the figures from the Times survey, but broke down the overall percentage into differing age groups, within which the Muslim population of 0-4 year olds now numbers close to 10%.
Patrick Sookhdeo of the Barnabas Fund has little time for such surveys; his personal viewpoint being there are at least four million Muslims living in Britain, which is certainly a more believable figure given the puzzlingly disproportionate clout Islam currently exerts over British authorities, not to mention the confusion surrounding official statistics.
Suppose though, that all the above are mistaken, and Britain’s Muslim population is far higher than anyone has yet to admit?
Such a scenario is more probable than improbable. Were Britain an Eastern bloc country circa 1975 then it would know exactly how many people entered and exited it’s borders over any given time scale, but the truth in Britain of 2009 is that no one has the faintest idea who comes in and who leaves.
A recent Daily Telegraph article tells us of a gang of illegal immigrants running one of the biggest visa scams in Britain. The ringleader by name of Jatinder Sharma was accused of submitting visa applications based on thousands of forged documents to the British Home Office all of which were rubber stamped by the equal opportunity officials with nary a backward glance, although one assumes they were scanned assiduously for that dirty word “Gurkha.”
The UK Border Agency (UKBA) was rebuked last year for hosting a Christmas party where the invitations consisted of mocked up visas inside fake British passports, a Home Office jape which unfortunately coincided with news that 300,000 immigrants had been processed by said UK Border Agency that year, and for many other years, with obviously fraudulent paperwork because to deny them entry meant increased form filling.
Not that this is much of a surprise. The UK Border Agency lacks sufficient staff, particularly lean men of substance to ensure complete surveillance of our borders, especially so over weekends and national holidays when quite unbelievably they have been told not to arrest anybody- so a little tip to any ambitious Afghans, striving Somalis or peripatetic Pakistanis without the correct paperwork, is to turn yourself in to the authorities on a Saturday afternoon when Manchester United is playing Chelsea. In wintertime. When it is raining - at dusk.
What is something of a surprise however is who partially co-sponsored the £140,000 UK Border Agency Christmas knees-up, fake visa invitations included. Step forward Clear Springs Property Management and The Angel Group, two privately run organisations who make millions from the British government by housing illegal immigrants and asylum seekers, not always in accommodation fit for human habitation.
In 2003, Julia Davey, the owner of The Angel Group, collected almost 1.5 million pounds in salary and dividends. Nice work if you can get it, but try getting it without having a “friend” in the higher echelons of government. In Davey’s case her name has allegedly been mentioned in association with an ex-Home Secretary and ex-Communist sympathiser (take your pick as regards the name, it could be one of four and the short straw wins) always useful if you want to enrich yourself at the expense of the British taxpayer whilst reaping the 90% Labour voting pattern of third world immigrants even as you destroy your own country.
Britain is out Mecca-ing Mecca as a destination for Muslim students from Pakistan, who come to the UK on fraudulent study visas all the time. A few months ago Britain had 15,000 schools and colleges open to non-EU students, the majority of which appear to have been used as a major conduit in the trafficking and promotion of Islamic extremism and terrorism within our borders. Of the twelve Muslim terror suspects arrested in April 2009, ten were here on student visas.
The vast majority of these “students” are not interviewed by the Home Office, nor are they interviewed by the British High Commission in Pakistan where security threats are now so high that officials, nationality unknown, vet potential students over the phone in……… Abu Dhabi! Perhaps if we were slightly more stringent we would never have allowed Dhiren Barot, often quoted as Osama Bin Laden’s second in command in Europe, to study at Brunel University on forged identification documents.
This has led to a serious rise in extremism on university campuses, where one in three Muslim students think it is acceptable to kill in the name of Islam. Some forty-eight universities have been infiltrated, including Oxford, Cambridge, Imperial and the London School of Economics, yet many of those with a student visa obtained in Pakistan do not even bother to attend college. They arrive in Britain and simply disappear. At the time of writing it is not legally necessary for the educational institutions to notify the authorities that Mustafa Bint or Justada Kamel had been granted a visa but subsequently gone AWOL.
The Yorkshire Post points out that 10,000 non- EU students failed to attend local universities over the last three years. One faculty in Manchester claimed to have more than one hundred students whilst foolishly providing only two desks, and an international college in London with links to Pakistani businessmen is alleged to have made five million pounds by selling 2,500 forged visas.
In March 2009 a new ruling decreed the 15,000 educational establishments must be registered with a government authority. To date, only 10% have done so, out of which a quarter were rejected. Ninety percent of them have simply evaporated. How many students passed through nobody knows and just in case you were thinking that good old Britain has started to get its act together, I should point out that the government authority in question is none other than the UK Border Agency, who admit they cannot track non-student students until they have fixed their computer systems, a not inconsequential matter they predict will take place in 2010. Possibly.
How many other people come in? Again, no one really knows. British MP Ann Cryer, who represents Keighley, a town near Bradford, estimates that 1 million Pakistanis came to Britain over the last four years to work, study or marry, with imported wives making up 80% of all marriages in her area.
If one wishes to wage demographic warfare against a benevolent and naïve country, polygamy is really the way to go. One man has four wives, aka baby machines, each of whom produces five children, all twenty-five one of whom (father, wives and children) will be financially maintained by the British Government, even though polygamy is illegal in Britain.
Such insanity goes some way toward explaining why only two out of three babies born in Britain today are classified as white British, with twenty percent of mothers being first generation immigrants and a further twenty five percent of mothers being second or third generation immigrants. In London, for the first time in history, white school children now enter their first year as an ethnic minority.
Now clearly, not all non-white births are to Muslim parents, but such figures make a mockery of the average middle-class assumption that indigenous Brits make up ninety percent of the population, and the Johnny foreigner-come-latelys only ten percent. Indeed, one million people from Pakistan alone over four years alone is an astonishing figure, even assuming the real figure is not considerably higher.
When Eastern European countries joined the EU, our wonderfully prescient government predicted a mere seventeen thousand people would venture west. That figure is closer to two million of course, at the very least, and Migration Watch UK tells us that nine out of ten recent immigrants are of non-European heritage, which effectively means an additional eighteen-million non-EU immigrants our government chooses not to tell us about.
Going back to the Independent article written by Martin Baker, one is struck by his persuasive simplicity. The people he cites in his argument that an extra 20 million people reside on our small, damp and wind swept island are not gimlet bespectacled micro-statisticians getting everything wrong in the backrooms of failing banks whilst in the possession of petroleum based shirts, wide soled shoes and the entire DVD content of Star Trek, but national food producers and chairmen of supermarket conglomerates, who tell us with brutal honesty that the Britain of 60 million people simply cannot consume so many calories without turning into Little Rock, Arkansas.
This extra 20 million people is borne out by the National Insurance numbers issued in Britain, which outnumber eligible British citizens by 29 million. As it is impossible to obtain welfare benefits without NI numbers, they thus become a matter of vital importance to the forty percent of British Muslims who devote ceaseless time, energy and self-sacrifice into remaining resolutely unemployed, although, to be fair, providing for four wives and twenty five children is probably beyond the financial means of Warren Buffet let alone Sammy Achmed, late of Waziristan, occupation goatherd. Abu “old-hooky” Hamza for example received almost £5,000 per month, to finance his half a million pound house, his current wife, and her seven children, and of course he received this from the very British government he seeks to overthrow. Dear God, please tell me this cannot really be happening.
One does not need to read - or more pertinently to read between the lines - official statistics to gain a picture of reality. There are vast areas of Britain that have been physically transformed into the East in a blink of an eye. Although one sees very few veiled ladies on the streets in my area, which unlike many parts of modern Britain is 80% indigenous, a continental shift occurs the moments one sets foot into the maternity ward of the local hospital, which more resembles Islamabad than Isleworth.
No one from the British government will refute this. They will call you a racist for raising the issue even as they admit the last twelve years has seen an influx of non-EU immigration twenty-five times higher than ever before and even as they cheerfully admit a la Hazel Blears that Britain has become an immigration mad house in which no one has the faintest idea who is here and who is not. We don’t even really know how many indigenous Brits are emigrating. Official reports suggest 1,000 per day, but this could be far higher given the misery that currently exists in Britain, particularly England, coupled with the fact that ALL official figures are just guesstimates, ALL of which have historically proven to be not just inaccurate but as wrong as wrong can be.
Is it racist and xenophobic to raise this issue? I am sure many people will think it is, but they should be aware that the huge number of Pakistani Muslims who came here over the last few years come from a country where only 19% of people have a negative view of al- Qaeda and by default the taliban, and where 75% wish to see Sharia law implemented. Or in other words, out of every five Pakistanis entering Britain, four of them statistically wish to overthrow us.
Although British and Western liberals may decry this, it is not a view shared by Islamic extremists, who view such ridiculously naïve people as Lenin once viewed his very own Western useful idiots. Saudi Arabia, the home of Mecca, Medina and Mohammed has not spent 90 billion dollars entrenching Islam in Europe in order to achieve peaceful co-existence. They can do this far less expensively by just selling us oil and leaving us be, but that is not their agenda simply because it was not Mohammed’s agenda.
In 1974, former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne said in a speech at the U.N.:
"One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere to go to the northern hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory."
Libyan president Mommar Ghadaffi added for good measure:
We have 50 million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe - without swords, without guns, without conquests. The fifty million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades…. Europe is in a predicament, and so is America. They should agree to become Islamic in the course of time, or else declare war on the Muslims.
Paul Goodman, the conservative shadow Minister for “community cohesion” representing High Wycombe, an area historically known only as a stockbroker belt due to it’s close proximity to London, has stated that his constituency will be 25% Muslim within the next fourteen years. Any English readers who are familiar with High Wycombe will tell you that if such an area is being Islamified then quite frankly, it is all over. Or yet to begin.
In conclusion, we don’t really know how many Muslims there are in Britain. The accepted number is 2.4 million, but our government which hates traditional England constantly lies to us, and based on all the above, the true number of Muslims in Britain it could just as well be anywhere between five and fifteen million, which means ten million to thirty million within one generation, which means the end of Britain as a liberal democracy.
I am not surprised that the British Government wishes to cover such appalling realities up. If the truth were known it is hard to believe even the docile British people would not take to the streets. Or perhaps that is just wishful thinking.
Paul, its so good to see you back. Your blog had seemed baron for quite some time so I thought youd gone back to civvy street and hung up your fighting gloves. Seems I was mistaken.ReplyDelete
I found you again through another blogger who blogged about your Gates of Vienna linked piece - then I remembered, you obe had a blog. Seems I found it again.
As a dedicated British Nationalist (not of the loony bent) I find your articles extremely refreshing and also factual based with the sources you provide.
We are extremely close in our outlooks, but you seem to be able to stick it together so much better than I could.
I enjoy your work, and the way you honestly just tell it as it is.
Good to see you writing again.
All the best,
Thank you, Paul from Lancashire.ReplyDelete
And let's not forget the EU/Labour/BBC/Guardian campaign to get 70 million Muslim Turks into the EU (and as many millions of them who want to come, into Britain).ReplyDelete
"ten million to thirty million within one generation, which means the end of Britain as a liberal democracy"ReplyDelete
Nigeria (50% Muslim) is democratic. Kazakhstan (57% Muslim) is democratic. Lebanon (60% Muslim) is democratic. Malaysia (60% Muslim) is democratic. Albania (80% Muslim) is democratic. Kuwait (85% Muslim) is democratic. Uzbekistan (88% Muslim) is democratic. Bangladesh (89% Muslim) is democratic. Niger (90% Muslim) is democratic. Senegal (94% Muslim) is democratic. Jordan (95% Muslim) is democratic. Pakistan (97% Muslim) is democratic. Iran (98% Muslim) is democratic. Morocco (99% Muslim) is democratic. Turkey (99% Muslim) is democratic. Algeria (99% Muslim) is democratic.
The list goes on. Your dishonest attempt to equate Islam with Saudi Arabia will not fool any except the most ignorant readers.
I am sure you aware Soviet Russia was also "democratic" even though there was only one party to vote for.
Your list of "democratic" countries above will give any sane person pause for thought, but you could have saved yourself a great deal of time by looking at the words I used....which were "liberal democracy"
Do you think really think democracy applies to Iran and Niger, let alone liberal democracy?
Do you even begin to understand what freedom means?
I do sincerely hope you can win and get into parliment. Anonymous is Anonymous because he knows he will be refuted but the fact he came to this site means either hes thinking or got to the island by taking a wrongturn at what is federal liberal democracy. I sincerely hope Lord Ahmed is tried for treason and sedition, convicted and then imprisoned like in the northern orkneys or something (if he is executed, you will see London burn the same day and the gov't knows and that is why he is still free). If you lose however, I say move to the states and try to rally real English from here instead. We, the US are headed towards the Euro-death but we might have a few more years, because probably the hispanics will save us from the Islamic because demographically the hispanics are rapidly becoming a majority, and they are predominantly Roman Catholic (whoo!. I say though all the indigeneous English should come back to their old colony if they have to emigrate, i mean English men here have the highest fathering rate of all white ethnicities, that and I have always wanted an english wife. Anyways all the best sir and hold the line as long as you canReplyDelete
At least Iran does not criminalize questioning the Holocaust, which makes it more liberal than much of Europe. At least Iran does not have surveillance cameras on every other street, which makes it more liberal than Britain. At least Iran doesn't tell the USA that it should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons, which makes it more liberal than the USA.ReplyDelete
As for freedom, I submit that any country with a debt-based banking system is not free. As such, Islamic countries which use debt-free Islamic banking are better examples of freedom in the world today. Britain ceased to be free ever since the Bank of England was set up in 1815 by Nathan Mayer Rothschild. We have been a Zionist colony for almost 200 years. (@ Arthur from Florida: the USA has not been free ever since the Federal Reserve was set up in 1913 by Jacob Schiff Rothschild. You have been a Zionist colony for almost 100 years.) Look it up yourself. Muslims would give us back our freedom by introducing Islamic banking to us, and here you are inverting the truth by claiming they are here to take freedom away. Who do you really work for, Paul Weston? Maybe you should stick that 'We support Israel' banner from Gates of Vienna on this blog as well so that there is no ambiguity.
If I knew how to import the flag I would.
I stand full square behind Israel.
Well I would be happier to live in a Zionist Colony then in Islamified dhimmi ignorance. Who cares about the Federal Reserve? Had it not existed, marshall couldn't have financed his plan that helped save Europe, to the extent the war itself did...the US could not have financed any of its booms at all in the past ninety-seven years....1913 wasnt't the Fed. itself dinkus, that was th Income Tax Amendment (which isn't fun on April 15th, but helps fund the whole country)...actually the Palestinians invaded Israel on its 1st Day along with practically half the umma and it resoundly defeated them all, and well yes, the Fed. does predominantly run by Jewish bankers, but they themselves arent rulers of squat except paychecks and dollar bills...I doubt you are one of us, and you do fight behind a cloud because you are afraid once your thoughts are tagged to you you will become someone different and that is a fallacy, I care not who you are, only ask you not to put a gun to my head and if the time comes I will protect you from the umma in the UK since I doubt you are a muslim because you do not follow many suras, and thus you are a kafir along with me....so why you argue boggles my mind
Nigeria is democratic? Pakistan is democratic? Algeria is democratic?ReplyDelete
Well, North Korea is also officially called a 'People's Democratic Republic'.
And didn't the Khmer Rouge refer to the country they ruled as 'democratic Kampuchea'?